DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Rolfs v. Home Depot, 2013 DNH 121 (2013)

Citation
Rolfs v. Home Depot, 2013 DNH 121 (2013)
Parent Document
Rolfs v. Home Depot, 2013 DNH 121 (2013)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
2013-09-20
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10693813/rolfs-v-home-depot/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (677)

Full Text

556 chars 
30
     By placing Rolfs on a PIP in March 2010, Kelly
     deprived Rolfs of a bonus that would have exceeded
     $18,000 that Rolfs had earned in the second half of
     2009 because of his performance in sales and profit.
     Kelly’s ongoing harassment,8 and Home Depot’s failure
     to remedy the hostile environment, forced Rolfs to
     resign his position at Home Depot for a much less-
     lucrative position where he could salvage his career.
     Thus, Rolfs has satisfied the adverse employment
     action element of his retaliation claim.