Section 34-18-2
- Citation
- Section 34-18-2
- Parent Document
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 1998-06-19
Other Sections in This Document (47)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
Full Text
424 charsThis approach disavows an earlier requirement of first having to .establish a defendant’s exclusive control of the premises for the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to apply, thus parting company with Rhode Island’s former rule that a plaintiff had to demonstrate that the defendant at the time of the accident exclusively controlled the instrumentality of the plaintiff’s injury. Parrillo, 426 A.2d at 1320; see also Marshall,