Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Citation
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Parent Document
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 1998-06-19
Other Sections in This Document (47)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Errico v. LaMountain, 713 A.2d 791 (1998)
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- Section 34-18-2
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
- § 34-18-26
Full Text
754 charsErrico further claimed that as a direct and proximate result of her fall, she sustained severe and permanent personal injuries of both a physical and a mental nature and that she suffered and would continue to suffer in the future lost wages as well as pain and suffering. The matter proceeded to trial, during which both parties presented their evidence and rested, whereupon the LaMountains moved for a directed verdict (now a judgment as a matter of law) pursuant to Rule 50 of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure. The trial justice denied this request, and thereafter the jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs in the amount of $100,000. In due course the trial justice denied defendants’ later motion for a new trial, and this appeal ensued.