Section 19a-87b-9
- Citation
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Parent Document
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2008-08-27
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2367702/bray-v-bray/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (88)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Section 47a-7
- Section 47a-7
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
Full Text
680 chars217 Conn. 57, 584 A.2d 458 (1991), in which the plaintiff sought to evict the defendant for failure to pay a disputed $25 of an approximately $500 monthly rent. The court, recognizing the grave disproportionality between the plaintiffs loss of $25, on the one hand, and the defendant’s forfeiture of both a $9900 deposit and the security of a ninety-nine year lease on the other, reversed the trial court’s finding in favor of the plaintiff, holding that “[t]he doctrine against forfeitures applies to a failure to pay rent in full when that failure is accompanied by a good faith intent to comply with the lease or a good faith dispute over the meaning of a lease.” Id., 69. *145