Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Citation
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Parent Document
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2008-08-27
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2367702/bray-v-bray/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (88)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Bray v. Bray, 978 A.2d 582 (2008)
- Section 47a-7
- Section 47a-7
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
- Section 19a-87b-9
Full Text
1,075 charsThe court finds the following facts. The parties were married on August 27, 1994, but divorced on July 17, 2007, pursuant to a separation agreement. That agreement provided, inter alia, that (1) the plaintiff was to retain sole ownership of their property at 527 Main Street, Somers, (2) the plaintiff was to pay the defendant alimony at the rate of $200 per week, or $860 per month, for a period of seventy-eight months from the date of judgment, and (3) that the defendant was to reside at 527 Main Street in return for rental payments of $860 per month. The rental agreement was to “be considered a landlord tenant relationship and nothing in this agreement shall change the legal nature of that arrangement.” The separation agreement also provided that “the parties shall be equally obligated to pay the amount due on [certain] credit cards.” The plaintiff submitted a series of e-mails between the parties in which he proposed that his alimony payments begin on August 1, culminating in the defendant’s agreement that “[w]e need to exchange checks and August 1 is fine.”