Section 31-290a
- Citation
- Section 31-290a
- Parent Document
- Loftus v. Vincent, 49 Conn. App. 66 (1998)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1998-06-16
Other Sections in This Document (22)
- Loftus v. Vincent, 49 Conn. App. 66 (1998)
- Loftus v. Vincent, 49 Conn. App. 66 (1998)
- Loftus v. Vincent, 49 Conn. App. 66 (1998)
- Loftus v. Vincent, 49 Conn. App. 66 (1998)
- Loftus v. Vincent, 49 Conn. App. 66 (1998)
- Loftus v. Vincent, 49 Conn. App. 66 (1998)
- Loftus v. Vincent, 49 Conn. App. 66 (1998)
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
- Section 31-290a
Full Text
477 charsThe plaintiff maintains that workers’ compensation payments cannot be offset against an award for retalia*74tory discharge because of the collateral source rule. We need not explore the intricacies of that claim.3 In this case, both the retaliatory discharge and the workers’ compensation awards involve the same source, the defendant, and the period for which an allowance of back wages was made by the commissioner overlaps the period of disability resulting from the injury.