Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Loftus v. Vincent, 49 Conn. App. 66 (1998)

Citation
Loftus v. Vincent, 49 Conn. App. 66 (1998)
Parent Document
Loftus v. Vincent, 49 Conn. App. 66 (1998)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1998-06-16

Full Text

564 chars
The defendant contends that the decision should be reversed for the following reasons: (1) the plaintiff was never discharged; (2) the evidence is insufficient to satisfy the requirements established by our precedent for proof of a wrongful termination; (3) one of the commissioner’s findings is unsupported by the evidence; and (4) the commissioner’s award should be reduced by the amount the plaintiff received as workers’ compensation benefits during the period for which the commissioner awarded him back wages. We conclude that only the final claim has merit.