Section 232-a

Citation: Section 232-a
Parent Document: Waterbury Twin, LLC v. Renal Treatment Centers-Northeast, Inc., 974 A.2d 626 (2009)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2009-07-14
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1539908/waterbury-twin-llc-v-renal-trea... ↗

Full Text

851 chars

In the present case, the majority requires that the plaintiffs serve a new notice to quit prior to bringing a new summary process action despite the presumed validity of the first notice to quit.11 disagree. The majority’s conclusion is, at the very least, inconsistent with our long-standing, well established body of case law holding that a valid notice to quit terminates the lease.2 *479Moreover, given that a valid notice to quit already had been served on the defendants and it terminated the lease between the parties, service of an additional notice to quit is unnecessary, duplicative and contrary to the very purpose of summary process, which is to provide an expeditious remedy for a landlord seeking to obtain possession of leased premises. Bristol v. Ocean State Job Lot Stores of Connecticut, Inc., 284 Conn. 1, 5-6, 931 A.2d 837 (2007).

Other Sections in This Document (118)

Full Text