Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)

Citation
Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)
Parent Document
Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
1994-01-15

Other Sections in This Document (62)

Full Text

522 chars
The plaintiffs’ M.G.L.c. 93A claim against Quinn and his brother Jarlath Quinn d/b/a Pleasures must fail because the plaintiffs have failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that these defendants committed any unfair or deceptive act or practice that caused the plaintiffs to suffer any loss. Similarly, the plaintiffs’ M.G.L.c. 93A claim against Rich-Camiel, Inc. must fail because Rich-Camiel, Inc. had been dissolved and had ceased to exist as a legal entity before the plaintiffs had any contact with it.