DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)

Citation
Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)
Parent Document
Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
1994-01-15
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8351304/azar-v-quinn/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (62)

Full Text

481 chars 
The plaintiffs contend that Cohen and Camiel are liable to them under M.G.L.c. 93A, §11 for making various self-serving, false, and misleading representations which induced them to open the Ritz at the Premises. The plaintiffs contend that their losses were caused by Cohen’s and Camiel’s actions and that such losses were a foreseeable consequence of the deceptive representations. This Court finds that Cohen and Camiel were engaged in commerce for purposes of M.G.L.c. 93A, §11.