Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)

Citation: Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)
Parent Document: Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 1994-01-15
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8351304/azar-v-quinn/ ↗

Full Text

765 chars

On December 31, 1987 Quinn served the plaintiffs with a notice to quit, vacate, and surrender their space at the Premises. (Exhibit 18.) The plaintiffs refused to leave, maintaining that they had a right to be there. Quinn never took further action to evict the plaintiffs. The number of hair stylists employed by Pleasures and the number of people getting their hair done at Pleasures decreased somewhat after Quinn bought Pleasures. Several witnesses testified that Quinn was not quite as fastidious as Camiel had been in keeping Pleasures spotless, but they agreed he did employ cleaners to clean Pleasures once a week. Occasionally an electrical fuse would blow out in the fuse box inside Pleasures temporarily interrupting electricity to parts of the Premises.

Other Sections in This Document (62)

Full Text