Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)

Citation: Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)
Parent Document: Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 1994-01-15
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8351304/azar-v-quinn/ ↗

Full Text

1,136 chars

Roberta Camiel (“Camiel”), a named individual defendant here, and Martin Rich (“Rich”), also an individual, owned Rich-Camiel, Inc. (“Rich-Camiel”), a business duly registered with the Secretary of State’s Office for the Commonwealth from 1983 to 1987, with a regular and usual place of business at Revere, Suffolk County. Rich-Camiel extensively renovated the Premises into a fashionable hair salon, which it opened under the name “Pleasures” in 1983. (Exhibit 2.) By late 1986 Pleasures was experiencing financial difficulties and had fallen behind on its rent payments to Associates. On February 18, 1987 Associates sent Rich-Camiel a Notice to Quit for non-payment of rent. (Exhibit 7.) On April 29, 1987 Rich-Camiel entered into an eviction proceeding settlement with Associates signed by Cohen that provided for the payment to Associates of a lump sum of cash for the rent arrear-ages in exchange for which Pleasures was authorized to stay on as a tenant at will. (Exhibit 8.) The settlement further provided explicitly that Rich and Camiel would use their best efforts to sell Pleasures and to find a new tenant for the Premises.

Other Sections in This Document (62)

Full Text