Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)

Citation: Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)
Parent Document: Azar v. Quinn, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 519 (1994)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 1994-01-15
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8351304/azar-v-quinn/ ↗

Full Text

847 chars

That same day, September 1, 1987, Camiel asked Azar to meet with her at the Family Restaurant in Brookline. There she introduced Quinn to Azar as the new owner and general manager of Pleasures. Azar testified that he was shocked and immediately inquired as to the status of the plaintiffs’ forthcoming sublease under Pleasures’ new ownership. Quinn told Azar that he would be happy to honor Camiel’s arrangement to sublease space to the plaintiffs. As of September 1, 1987 Pleasures was a tenant at will at the Premises. At no time thereafter during the relevant time period did Pleasures enter into a written lease with Associates for the Premises. At no time did Quinn enter into a written sublease with the plaintiffs for space at the Premises. The plaintiffs never held any property right in the Premises greater than that of a tenant at will.

Other Sections in This Document (62)

Full Text