Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 1–20 of 362 results

Sec. 7-148d

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-148d Connecticut state

(b) If the commission determines, after a hearing, that a landlord has retaliated in any manner against a tenant because the tenant has complained to the commission, the commission may order the landlord to cease and desist from such conduct...

Section 47a-20a

Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005) Connecticut state

...Because the plaintiff did not prove one of those grounds, he did not rebut the presumption of retaliation. The court therefore improperly determined that the plaintiff prevailed in rebutting a presumption of retaliation under § 47a-20.

Section 4-61dd

Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024) Connecticut state

In the present case, E’s grievances, which she asserted under § 4-61dd (e) (3), did not raise a claim of whistleblower retaliation, and E was, therefore, not barred from filing a complaint with the commission alleging whistleblower retaliation pursuant...

Section 4-61dd

Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024) Connecticut state

Specifically, the statutory scheme contemplates that a state employee may pursue both a grievance alleging a violation of an applicable collec- tive bargaining agreement that does not involve a whistleblower claim, as well as a whistleblower retaliation claim alleging retaliatory...

Ayantola v. Board of Trustees of Technical Colleges, 976 A.2d 784 (2009)

Ayantola v. Board of Trustees of Technical Colleges, 976 A.2d 784 (2009) Connecticut state

...Because we affirm the conclusion of the court that the plaintiff failed to make out a prima facie case of retaliation, we do not engage in further analysis of the retaliation claim. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial...

Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024)

Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024) Connecticut state

Specifically, the statutory scheme contemplates that a state employee may pursue both a grievance alleging a violation of an applicable collec- tive bargaining agreement that does not involve a whistleblower claim, as well as a whistleblower retaliation claim alleging retaliatory...

Section 4-61dd

Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024) Connecticut state

...Thus, § 4-61dd protects a state employee from retaliation by a state employer for that employee’s disclosure of certain information. In other words, the right provided by the statute is not to be retaliated against for engaging in a...

Section 4-61dd

Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024) Connecticut state

may be submitted through the grievance process that would trigger the alternative remedies scheme, the right provided for by § 4-61dd (e) (2) (A) is a right not to be retaliated against for disclosing certain whistleblower information. Cf. Southern New...

Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024)

Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024) Connecticut state

In the present case, E’s grievances, which she asserted under § 4-61dd (e) (3), did not raise a claim of whistleblower retaliation, and E was, therefore, not barred from filing a complaint with the commission alleging whistleblower retaliation pursuant...

Section 4-61dd

Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024) Connecticut state

may be submitted through the grievance process that would trigger the alternative remedies scheme, the right provided for by § 4-61dd (e) (2) (A) is a right not to be retaliated against for disclosing certain whistleblower information. Cf. Southern New...

Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)

Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012) Connecticut state

The plaintiff next claims that there was not substantial evidence to show that his actions amounted to retaliation against Schwartz. He argues that some of the items Schwartz claims to have been missing were shown to have been delivered to...

Ayantola v. Board of Trustees of Technical Colleges, 976 A.2d 784 (2009)

Ayantola v. Board of Trustees of Technical Colleges, 976 A.2d 784 (2009) Connecticut state

Having found that the plaintiff did not even make out a prima facie case of retaliation, we reject without further analysis his third claim, which is that the court improperly concluded that the defendant did not retaliate against him.

Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024)

Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024) Connecticut state

...Thus, § 4-61dd protects a state employee from retaliation by a state employer for that employee’s disclosure of certain information. In other words, the right provided by the statute is not to be retaliated against for engaging in a...

Section 47a-20a

Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005) Connecticut state

...Any grounds established by the plaintiff to rebut the presumption of retaliation under § 47a-20, therefore, must be in response to the dispute over the stove and not to the defendant’s verbal abuse. Again, because the plaintiff did not...

Ayantola v. Board of Trustees of Technical Colleges, 976 A.2d 784 (2009)

Ayantola v. Board of Trustees of Technical Colleges, 976 A.2d 784 (2009) Connecticut state

The plaintiff, Job Adisa Ayantola, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, the Board of Trustees of Technical Colleges, in this action to recover damages for alleged employment discrimination and retaliation in violation...

Section 4-61dd

Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024) Connecticut state

1. The commission had subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate E’s whis- tleblower retaliation claim:

Ayantola v. Board of Trustees of Technical Colleges, 976 A.2d 784 (2009)

Ayantola v. Board of Trustees of Technical Colleges, 976 A.2d 784 (2009) Connecticut state

In the present case, the court correctly identified the legal standard to be applied in determining whether retaliation took place. Neither party disputes that causation is a legal element of proving a prima facie case of retaliation. The question therefore...

Section 4-61dd

Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024) Connecticut state

Accordingly, the commission had the authority to adjudicate the type of controversy before it, namely, a whistleblower retaliation claim.

Gibilisco v. Tilcon (2021)

Gibilisco v. Tilcon (2021) Connecticut state

Gibilisco v. Tilcon (citation pending) Date filed: 2021-04-20 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4874669/gibilisco-v-tilcon/ --- 010combined ---

Murcia v. Geyer (2014)

Murcia v. Geyer (2014) Connecticut state

Murcia v. Geyer (citation pending) Date filed: 2014-06-24 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2684482/murcia-v-geyer/ --- 010combined ---