Section 47a-20a
- Citation
- Section 47a-20a
- Parent Document
- Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-08-30
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2329097/correa-v-ward/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (40)
- Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005)
- Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005)
- Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005)
- Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005)
- Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005)
- Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005)
- Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005)
- Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005)
- Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005)
- Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005)
- Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005)
- Correa v. Ward, 881 A.2d 393 (2005)
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
Full Text
413 charscost of the stove. Neither is a valid ground to rebut the presumption of retaliation, however, because neither falls under any of the four exclusive grounds listed in § 47a-20a. Because the plaintiff did not prove one of those grounds, he did not rebut the presumption of retaliation. The court therefore improperly determined that the plaintiff prevailed in rebutting a presumption of retaliation under § 47a-20.