Section 1951
- Citation
- Section 1951
- Parent Document
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-07-28
Other Sections in This Document (165)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 1950
- Section 1950
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 30
- Section 1954
- Section 1954
Full Text
661 chars(1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 1294, 1308 [71 Cal.Rptr.2d 122]) or adequately addressed in our discussion. The principal new argument is that section 1950.7 is preempted by the current Bankruptcy Code. While we need not and do not reach this belated contention, we note that the petition does not identify precisely how much of the field of tenant security deposit law Congress has allegedly intended to occupy, and that the argument rests on the unsupported assumption that section 1950.7 would not be applied in a bankruptcy — a proposition no reported case has considered, and at least one commentary has rejected (St. James, supra, 26 Cal. Bankr. J. at pp. 50-51). 7