section 6

Citation: section 6
Parent Document: 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2005-07-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2281319/250-llc-v-photopoint-corpusa/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (165)

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 30
Section 1954
Section 1954

Full Text

149 chars

209 Cal.App.3d at p. 209.) This conclusion is directly at odds with 250’s reading of the statute. Under 250’s interpretation, the landlord in Winston