section 6

Citation: section 6
Parent Document: 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2005-07-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2281319/250-llc-v-photopoint-corpusa/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (165)

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 30
Section 1954
Section 1954

Full Text

594 chars

court found that the landlord was entitled to damages of $5,281.57, plus interest. The issue in the appeal was whether the security deposit could be offset against the judgment, in which case the landlord would have obtained a net recovery and been the prevailing party, or whether the security deposit had to be offset against the rent owed as of May 19, 1984, two weeks following the constructive eviction, pursuant to section 1950.7, subdivision (c), in which case the landlord would have owed the tenant money as of that date and the tenant would have been the prevailing party. The Winston