§ 1954

Citation: § 1954
Parent Document: DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2000-09-14
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2251161/dezerega-v-meggs/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (100)

DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954
§ 1954

Full Text

391 chars

That is, it is not suggested that any of the exceptions would apply to the relationship, if any, between plaintiffs and defendant. Plaintiffs do contend that one or more exceptions would apply if the named lessee, Michael Nnadi-Nwazurumike, were viewed as defendant’s landlord. As we conclude, however, defendant was plaintiffs’ “tenant,” for purposes of the Ordinance, as a matter of law. 7