Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)

Citation
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
Parent Document
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2000-09-14

Other Sections in This Document (100)

Full Text

560 chars
However there can be no issue here of plaintiffs’ consent to any subletting by defendant. They expressly consented to his occupancy in the underlying lease. This renders the cited provision irrelevant. Indeed the only apparent pertinence of the Act is its implied acknowledgment and ratification of the limitations imposed by some local ordinances on the eviction of persons who, like defendant, may not be “tenants” in the common law sense, but who entered the premises with the landlord’s consent and thereby acquired a right or claim to continued occupancy.