Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 1954

Citation
§ 1954
Parent Document
DeZerega v. Meggs, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366 (2000)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2000-09-14

Other Sections in This Document (100)

Full Text

609 chars
After noting that “[t]he agreement prohibits assignments and subleases and contains an integration clause,” the court quoted the prohibition in a footnote. It then wrote, “Although given considerable weight in this decision, this prohibition against assigning and subleasing was not briefed or argued by counsel.” Despite two subsequent opportunities—first in the appellate division, then here—plaintiffs have steadfastly ignored this provision. Their brief in the appellate division simply went without explanation from referring to defendant as a “roommate” to characterizing his estate as a “subtenancy.” 5