Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 7 Cal. App. 4th 1457 (1992)

Citation
Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 7 Cal. App. 4th 1457 (1992)
Parent Document
Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 7 Cal. App. 4th 1457 (1992)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1992-06-22

Other Sections in This Document (87)

Full Text

500 chars
One of respondent’s objections to the hearing examiner’s decision is that there was no ambiguity in the registration form. Even if that were true, the presumption that parking was not included in the rent in 1978 can be rebutted as it was by the tenant’s testimony. (Reg. 13004, subd. (e).) Although noting the ambiguity in the original registration form, the hearing • examiner recognized that the crucial question was whether or not the parking fee had been paid pursuant to a separate agreement. 3