Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 7 Cal. App. 4th 1457 (1992)

Citation: Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 7 Cal. App. 4th 1457 (1992)
Parent Document: Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 7 Cal. App. 4th 1457 (1992)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1992-06-22
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2279031/richman-v-santa-monica-rent-con... ↗

Full Text

601 chars

The Board argues that even if the Act is applicable, the binding effect of the Act depends on fact issues not litigated in the administrative proceedings (i.e., the exception for fraud and misrepresentation) and the matter should have been remanded to it for a hearing on those issues. The Board argues that the information on the original registration form would be found to be untrue if raised in an administrative hearing. However, that issue was determined in respondent’s favor by the hearing examiner, who found that there was no showing of misrepresentation or fraud in the registration form. 4

Other Sections in This Document (87)

Full Text