Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 7 Cal. App. 4th 1457 (1992)

Citation
Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 7 Cal. App. 4th 1457 (1992)
Parent Document
Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 7 Cal. App. 4th 1457 (1992)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1992-06-22

Other Sections in This Document (87)

Full Text

458 chars
The Board did not assess a penalty or sanction against respondent. As a matter of fact, it raised the MAR which respondent could charge on the subject unit; an action which benefited respondent. Moreover, the hearing examiner raised the MAR effective 30 days from the final Board decision and held that the raise would be only prospective in effect. Had the Board somehow allowed the tenant to recover for excess rent, then the Act might have come into play.