Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 7 Cal. App. 4th 1457 (1992)

Citation: Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 7 Cal. App. 4th 1457 (1992)
Parent Document: Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 7 Cal. App. 4th 1457 (1992)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1992-06-22
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2279031/richman-v-santa-monica-rent-con... ↗

Full Text

671 chars

The hearing examiner found that the contractual relationship between the tenant and respondent satisfied two of the three criteria set forth in regulation 3201 for a separate agreement in that the fee charged for parking was comparable to the fee which would be charged in an unregulated market, and there was no evidence that failure to pay the parking fee would cause eviction of the tenant. However, testimony of the tenant established that, during negotiations for occupancy, no distinction was drawn between the rent and the fee for parking nor was the tenant given an option to accept or reject the amenity. The hearing examiner concluded that payment for the *1462

Other Sections in This Document (87)

Full Text