Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 57 Cal. App. 4th 250 (1997)

Citation: Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 57 Cal. App. 4th 250 (1997)
Parent Document: Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 57 Cal. App. 4th 250 (1997)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1997-08-22
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2279131/sego-v-santa-monica-rent-control-board/ ↗

Full Text

545 chars

Appellants seek a remedy based upon Civil Code section 1947.8, subdivision (c). The requirements of the statute are mandatory. The Board’s refusal to respond to the request of the landlord is contrary to state law and an abuse of discretion. The Board has failed to provide the required procedures for certification of permissible rents, which must include administrative appeal rights and which would thereby provide landlords and tenants with judicial review by means of a petition for writ of administrative mandamus. 3. The SMRCCA Provisions

Other Sections in This Document (82)

Full Text