Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 57 Cal. App. 4th 250 (1997)

Citation
Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 57 Cal. App. 4th 250 (1997)
Parent Document
Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 57 Cal. App. 4th 250 (1997)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1997-08-22

Other Sections in This Document (82)

Full Text

525 chars
The Board opposed the motion for a peremptory writ. The Board contended that appellants were seeking to circumvent a tenant’s due process rights by seeking an order pursuant to Civil Code section 1947.8, subdivision (c). According to the Board, a tenant who claims that he or she has been overcharged in violation of the SMRCCA has three options available: The tenant (1) may file an excess rent complaint with the Board for an adjudication; (2) may withhold rent pursuant to the decision in Minelian v. *254 Manzella, supra,