Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 57 Cal. App. 4th 250 (1997)

Citation: Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 57 Cal. App. 4th 250 (1997)
Parent Document: Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 57 Cal. App. 4th 250 (1997)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1997-08-22
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2279131/sego-v-santa-monica-rent-control-board/ ↗

Full Text

978 chars

Civil Code section 1947.7, subdivision (b), provides: “An owner of a residential rental unit who is in substantial compliance with an ordinance or charter that controls or establishes a system of controls on the price at which residential rental units may be offered for rent or lease and which requires the registration of rents, or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto, shall not be assessed a penalty or any other sanction for noncompliance with the ordinance, charter, or regulation. [¶] . . . [^D ‘Substantial compliance,’ as used in this subdivision, means that the owner of a residential rental unit has made a good faith attempt to comply with the ordinance, charter, or regulation sufficient to reasonably carry out the intent and purpose of the ordinance, charter, or regulation, but is not in full compliance, and has, after receiving notice of a deficiency from the local agency, cured the defect in a timely manner, as reasonably determined by the local agency.”

Other Sections in This Document (82)

Full Text