Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 57 Cal. App. 4th 250 (1997)

Citation
Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 57 Cal. App. 4th 250 (1997)
Parent Document
Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 57 Cal. App. 4th 250 (1997)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1997-08-22

Other Sections in This Document (82)

Full Text

562 chars
At the hearing on the writ petition, tenant’s counsel appeared as well as counsel for the Board and appellants. The Board and tenant’s counsel stated that under SMRCCA there was no method by which a landlord could initiate a procedure to establish the appropriate level of rent, except the initial “base rent” determination. According to counsel, any subsequent determination would involve the issue of whether or not the owner was in substantial compliance with the rent control law because rent increases are not permitted if the landlord is not in compliance.