Ocean Park Associates v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 421 (2004)

Citation: Ocean Park Associates v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 421 (2004)
Parent Document: Ocean Park Associates v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 421 (2004)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2004-01-07
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2295617/ocean-park-associates-v-santa-m... ↗

Full Text

863 chars

The first witness was one of the Board inspectors, Murray Harreschou. He testified about his February 2000 inspection. He estimated that painting the walls and work on the floor should have been completed in a matter of days. He believed that finishing the common areas could be done in two weeks with a “decent size” crew. He equivocated somewhat on the recreation room, stating that it could be done in three weeks, but that spending a year could be reasonable if done in conjunction with other work. With respect to the sauna, he thought it should have been done in one or two months. Redoing the landscaping should take two weeks. He could not know the time needed for roof replacement, exterior painting, or the lobby remodel, but gave an estimate of less than one month for the lobby if the work were organized and all the trades and materials were on hand.

Other Sections in This Document (140)

Full Text