Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Western Land Office, Inc. v. Cervantes, 175 Cal. App. 3d 724 (1985)

Citation
Western Land Office, Inc. v. Cervantes, 175 Cal. App. 3d 724 (1985)
Parent Document
Western Land Office, Inc. v. Cervantes, 175 Cal. App. 3d 724 (1985)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1985-12-13

Other Sections in This Document (148)

Full Text

597 chars
At trial two of the landlord’s officers testified that retaliation played no part in the decision to evict the tenants. Paul Martinus put it this way: “Why we decided to close the camp, it was for economic reasons because we are seeing our expenses far exceed our income and we couldn’t see where the situation was going to change and we got the results back on our water quality and it didn’t meet the State standards and we couldn’t see any viable way to resolve that problem, so the choice was kind of made up for us.” Miltón Heinsen, the landlord’s president, said: “[0]ur reasons were we *730