Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Citation
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Parent Document
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2022-08-04
Other Sections in This Document (17)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp. (2022)
Full Text
498 chars2 Appellants’ malicious prosecution action consisted of four causes of action. Appellants appealed from the trial court’s order granting respondents’ anti-SLAPP motion as to the fourth cause of action, which “alleged that [respondents] had maliciously prosecuted an administrative proceeding before the California Public Utilities Commission . . . .” (Waterhouse Management Corp. et al. v. Arthur A. Allen et al. (Jan. 20, 2021, B303365), slip opn. at pp. 1-2 [nonpub. opn].) We affirmed the order.