Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

41-47 Nick LLC v. Odumosu, 2024 NY Slip Op 24167 (2024)

Citation
41-47 Nick LLC v. Odumosu, 2024 NY Slip Op 24167 (2024)
Parent Document
41-47 Nick LLC v. Odumosu, 2024 NY Slip Op 24167 (2024)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2024-06-11

Other Sections in This Document (66)

Full Text

774 chars
In Pehrson v Div. of Hous. & Cmty. Renewal of State, 34 Misc 3d 1220 (A), 2011 NY Slip Op. 52487 (U) (Sup Ct, New York County 2011), an Article 78 proceeding challenging a decision by DHCR that the landlord had not engaged in fraud and denying an overcharge complaint, the Supreme Court found that the facts and circumstances alleged by the tenant "support[ed] the requisite factors set forth in Grimm [and] trigger[ed] DHCR's duty to ascertain whether those allegations of fraud in the record, in turn, warrant[ed] the use of the default formula in calculating any rent overcharge . . . ." (Pehrson, 2011 NY Slip Op. 52487 (U), *2.) The Pehrson court set out three categories of actions set forth in Grimm which together can demonstrate sufficient indicia of fraud, to wit: