Section 2520
- Citation
- Section 2520
- Parent Document
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2016-12-28
Other Sections in This Document (77)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Section 5
- Section 5
- Section 5
- Section 5
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
Full Text
697 charsFor the foregoing reasons, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, in effect, declaring that the plaintiffs’ apartments are not subject to rent stabilization, and for summary judgment dismissing the second through fourth causes of action and so much of the first cause of action as sought injunctive relief. All of these causes of action were based on the premise that the plaintiffs’ apartments were subject to rent stabilization. For the same reasons, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for summary judgment declaring that their apartments were subject to rent stabilization. Class Action Certification