DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)

Citation
Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
Parent Document
Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2016-12-28
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4334594/bartis-v-harbor-tech-llc/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (77)

Full Text

549 chars 
“in response to a continuing housing shortage as well as the need to regulate buildings previously omitted from rent control laws. The goal of the RSL was to encourage future housing construction by allowing owners to implement reasonable rent increases; to prevent the exaction of ‘unjust, unreasonable and oppressive rents’; and to ‘forestall profiteering, speculation and other disruptive practices’ ” (Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P., 62 AD3d 71, 76 [2009], affd 13 NY3d 270 [2009], *57 quoting Administrative Code of City of NY § 26-501).