Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Citation
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Parent Document
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2016-12-28
Other Sections in This Document (77)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Section 5
- Section 5
- Section 5
- Section 5
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
Full Text
703 charsof five of the named plaintiffs, each of whom had initially been provided with a commercial lease at the outset of his or her tenancy. Each of these five plaintiffs maintained that his or her unit had not been upgraded to residential use, noting, among other things, that the same flooring existed from the previously used commercial building, that the only elevator in the building was a freight elevator, and that cooking facilities were not provided to each unit. These five plaintiffs also averred that they had made certain improvements to their units at their own expense. Finally, these five plaintiffs listed various complaints about the habitability of their apartments. The Order Appealed from