Section 2520
- Citation
- Section 2520
- Parent Document
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2016-12-28
Other Sections in This Document (77)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Bartis v. Harbor Tech, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8831 (2016)
- Section 5
- Section 5
- Section 5
- Section 5
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
- Section 2520
Full Text
503 chars18 NY3d 446, 454 [2012]), it is also significant to note that our conclusion is supported by two prior determinations of the Deputy Commissioner of the DHCR. In those prior determinations, which the defendant submitted in support of its cross motion, the DHCR set aside the determinations of rent administrators and found that two other buildings that had been converted from commercial to residential use after January 1, 1974, were exempt from rent stabilization, without applying the 75% requirement.