§ 11

Citation: § 11
Parent Document: Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2010-01-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2256036/chacon-v-litke/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (180)

Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
§ 11
§ 11
§ 11
§ 11
§ 11
§ 12
§ 12
§ 12
§ 12
§ 12
§ 12
§ 12
§ 12
Section 37
Section 37
Section 37
Section 37
Section 37
Section 37
Section 37
Section 37
Section 37
Section 37
Section 37
Section 37

Full Text

667 chars

The trial court also rejected the Chacons’ argument that McCurdy’s reasonable hourly rate was $400 and instead, “[ajfter reviewing all arguments and evidence submitted by the parties, including numerous expert declarations and the hourly rate set forth in [the Chacons’] fee agreement,” found that McCurdy’s reasonable hourly rate was $350. Litke does not dispute that $350 an hour is a reasonable market rate for the services provided by an attorney of McCurdy’s experience. Rather, he argues that the fee was excessive for the sole reason that it exceeded the amount the Chacons and McCurdy agreed to be a reasonable hourly rate in their fee agreement. He is wrong.