DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)

Citation
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Parent Document
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2010-01-19
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2256036/chacon-v-litke/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (180)

Full Text

542 chars 
As such, the judgment did not necessarily encompass the issue raised by the Chacons in their wrongful eviction action—their right to reoccupy the premises under the Ordinance upon expiration of the three-month period within which Litke was to have made repairs—and, therefore, whether Litke wrongfully maintained possession after this period by excluding them from the apartment. “The party asserting collateral estoppel bears the burden of establishing these requirements. [Citation.]” (Lucido v. Superior Court, supra, 51 Cal.3d at p. 341.)