Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)

Citation
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Parent Document
Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2010-01-19

Other Sections in This Document (180)

Full Text

581 chars
Evidence was presented that although Litke initially intended to allow the Chacons to reoccupy the apartment, he changed his mind after they “forced” him to file the unlawful detainer action. Litke admitted never telling the Chacons before they moved out that he planned to prohibit them from returning. Litke testified he did not believe he was required to finish the repairs, as he did not plan to rent the Chacons’ apartment. He believed the Chacons never intended to reoccupy the apartment and had no right to do so because they had signed the Stipulation staying the eviction.