Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Mansourian v. Regents of the University of California, 602 F. Supp. 3d 957 (2010)

Citation
Mansourian v. Regents of the University of California, 602 F. Supp. 3d 957 (2010)
Parent Document
Mansourian v. Regents of the University of California, 602 F. Supp. 3d 957 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-02-08

Other Sections in This Document (68)

Full Text

687 chars
OCR will not find a history and continuing practice
     of program expansion where an institution increases
     the proportional participation opportunities for
     [women] by reducing opportunities for [men] alone
     or by reducing participation opportunities for [men]
     to a proportionately greater degree than for [women].
     . . . [Option Two] considers an institution’s good
     faith remedial efforts through actual program expan-
     sion. . . . Cuts in the program for [women], even
     when coupled with cuts in the program for [men],
     cannot be considered remedial because they burden
     members of the sex already disadvantaged by the
     present program.