Mansourian v. Regents of the University of California, 602 F. Supp. 3d 957 (2010)

Citation: Mansourian v. Regents of the University of California, 602 F. Supp. 3d 957 (2010)
Parent Document: Mansourian v. Regents of the University of California, 602 F. Supp. 3d 957 (2010)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2010-02-08
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3065442/mansourian-v-regents-of-the-uni... ↗

Full Text

987 chars

The district court determined that the plaintiffs had ade-
quately pleaded a claim for effective accommodation under
Title IX by alleging that UCD “chooses to make fewer ath-
letic participation opportunities [available] to female students
than to male students.” The district court did not, however,
reach the merits of whether UCD complied with Option Two,
instead concluding that “money damages cannot be awarded
unless a plaintiff has given notice of and an opportunity to
rectify the specific violation alleged by a Title IX plaintiff.”
Finding that the plaintiffs had failed to provide such notice,
the district court granted summary judgment to UCD.
  11
    The record does not demonstrate that UCD has complied with either
Option One or Option Three, and UCD does not contend that it has.
2222 MANSOURIAN v. REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY    OF   CALIFORNIA
  This circuit has yet to address whether any such require-
ment applies in the athletics context. We conclude that it does
not.

Other Sections in This Document (68)

Full Text