Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 8

Citation
Section 8
Parent Document
Park Village Apartment Tenants Ass'n v. Mortimer Howard Trust, 636 F.3d 1150 (2011)
Effective Date
2011-02-25

Other Sections in This Document (141)

Full Text

849 chars
In a prior action, the district court enjoined the proposed
rent increase because Defendants failed to comply with the
notice requirements of § 1437f(c)(8). We affirmed. Park Vill.
Apartments Tenants Ass’n v. Mortimer Howard Trust, No. 06-
7389, 2007 WL 519038 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2007), aff’d, 252
F. App’x 152 (9th Cir. 2007). Defendants served a new notice
in May 2007. Plaintiffs again complained that the notice was
invalid, and on July 16, 2008, the district court handed down
another injunction. That injunction forbade the Defendants
from increasing rents or evicting tenants in the complex due
to non-payment of increased rent until Defendants properly
complied with the notice requirements. Defendants served
another notice on July 25, 2008. This notice was effective. It
contained the following certification, required by the Secre-
tary: