Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Luz Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998)

Citation
Luz Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998)
Parent Document
Luz Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998)
Effective Date
1998-12-02

Other Sections in This Document (152)

Full Text

655 chars
51
Gonzalez, of course, bears the burden of demonstrating that Moran should have known that her actions violated clearly established prohibitions of section 3617. Thus, under Celotex, Moran may prevail on her summary judgment motion without bringing forth "affidavits or other similar materials" negating Gonzalez's claim. See 477 U.S. at 323, 106 S.Ct. at 2553. Nonetheless, Moran must at least " 'show[ ]'--that is, point[ ] out to the district court--that there is an absence of evidence to support" Gonzalez's case. See id. at 325, 106 S.Ct. at 2554 (quoting Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 159, 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1609, 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970)).