Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Luz Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998)

Citation
Luz Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998)
Parent Document
Luz Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998)
Effective Date
1998-12-02

Other Sections in This Document (152)

Full Text

850 chars
21
In order to determine whether the letter satisfies the public concern requirement, we must analyze its "content, form, and context ... as revealed by the whole record," Connick, 461 U.S. at 147-48, 103 S.Ct. at 1690, and evaluate whether Gonzalez's purpose was "to raise issues of public concern, on the one hand, or to further her own private interest, on the other," Morgan v. Ford, 6 F.3d 750, 754 (11th Cir.1993). This question is one of law, not of fact. See Connick, 461 U.S. at 148 n. 7, 103 S.Ct. at 1690 n. 7. If it is unclear whether the letter satisfies the public concern requirement, then Moran is entitled to qualified immunity on Gonzalez's section 1983 claim because Moran's actions did not violate Gonzalez's clearly established First Amendment rights. See Badia v. City of Miami, 133 F.3d 1443, 1445 (11th Cir.1998) (per curiam).