Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010)

Citation
Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010)
Parent Document
Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-09-01

Other Sections in This Document (106)

Full Text

572 chars
The Gallagher Appellants also appeal the district court’s denial of their motion
to compel the production of Magner’s tax, banking, and cell phone records. They
contend that these records would lead to discoverable evidence to prove extortion for
their RICO claim. This issue does not warrant further discussion, as we agree with
the magistrate judge’s sound reasoning and conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion. See Stuart v. Gen. Motors Corp., 217 F.3d 621, 631 (8th Cir.
2000) (standard of review for denial of motion to compel). V.    Conclusion