Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010)

Citation
Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010)
Parent Document
Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-09-01

Other Sections in This Document (106)

Full Text

373 chars
-32-
of intentional destruction of evidence to suppress the truth, then the district court also
acts within its discretionary limits by denying sanctions for spoliation of evidence.
See Morris v. Union Pac. R.R., 373 F.3d 896, 901 (8th Cir. 2004) (“The most
important consideration in our analysis is the district court’s own finding regarding
Union Pacific’s intent.”).10