Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010)

Citation
Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010)
Parent Document
Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-09-01

Other Sections in This Document (106)

Full Text

327 chars
Proof of discriminatory purpose is crucial for a disparate treatment claim. Int’l
Bhd. of Teamsters v. United States, 431 U.S. 324, 335 n.15 (1977). Summary
judgment is warranted if the plaintiff cannot produce either (a) direct evidence of
discriminatory intent or (b) indirect evidence creating an inference of discriminatory