Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010)

Citation
Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010)
Parent Document
Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-09-01

Other Sections in This Document (106)

Full Text

758 chars
-23-
properties. As the district court explained, “PHA is an organization with a
comprehensive inspection schedule, staff dedicated to maintenance, and a
demonstrated record for maintaining its properties.” Steinhauser, 595 F. Supp. 2d at
1008. The evidence presented by Appellees shows that PHA responds quickly and
appropriately to DNHPI correction orders. The district court concluded, “Given the
City’s limited resources and PHA’s record of maintaining its properties, Defendants
have a rational basis for permitting PHA to manage its own repairs.” Id. at 1009.
Appellants fail to explain why this justification was inadequate. We conclude,
therefore, that summary judgment was appropriate on their equal-protection claim. D.     Substantive Due Process