DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999)

Citation
Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999)
Parent Document
Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999)
Effective Date
1999-07-12
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/765199/anna-harris-v-edna-itzhaki-rafae... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (88)

Full Text

339 chars 
The Itzhakis contend that Ms. Waldman’s statement should be treated as a “stray” remark, insufficient to establish discrimination. If the remark is unrelated to the decisional process, then it is insufficient to show discrimination. Merrick v. Farmers Ins. Group, 892 F.2d 1434, 1438 (9th Cir.1990); Smith v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.,